The Call for a World Constitutional Convention: An Application of John Lockes Theory of Revolution :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays

The jaw for a World Constitutional Convention An Application of John Lockes scheme of RevolutionABSTRACT A movement led by an system of rules called One World is advocating the idea of carry nation, whereby individuals everywhere would have the prospect to elect delegates to a humanness constitutional convention. In theory, any schedule drafted by this convention would be returned to individuals throughout the world for their approval. The assumption of the Direct Democracy movement is that individuals throughout the world have the right to electrical shunt existing governments in order to establish the rule of law on a global level. Leaders of this movement believe that the Direct Democracy movement is consistent with democratic ideas, including those articulated by Locke. Two questions atomic number 18 at issue. First, do individuals have the right to bypass existing governments in order to establish an international government? Second, is it desirable to establish world g overnment? I conclude that, according to Locke, sovereign former rests with individuals non governments. Individuals have the right to delegate a portion of their power from virtuoso government to another and, when they do so, revolution ensues. Revolution of this sort would be desirable because national governments cannot provide security in the nuclear age. So individuals should manoeuvre rough power from the national to the international level. The call for a world constitutional convention is a call for a cool revolution that could abolish war. Do People Have the Right to short-circuit Existing Governments?According to John Locke, governments derive their power from the consent of the governed. The power of government is the sum of the of the rights that government is lend oneselfn by the individuals in the companionship it governs. As Locke dry lands it the power of government is that power which every man, having in the state of nature, has given up into the hands of t he society, and therein to governours.(1)Having given up some rights to national governments, do individuals retain control of those rights so that they can transfer rights to an international government? Here we seem to confront a outsmart in Locke. Rights must be alienable in order for individuals to give rights to governments, yet citizens retain rights that allow them the right of rebellion. There are passages in Locke that suggest that rights can be permanently alienated, such as when Locke discusses a person who performs an act that deserves death such as one who initiates a state of war.