Outline and evaluate research into the nature of relationships Essay

A further difference found in the nature of relationships crosswise cultures is the level of continuity. Western societies comm single thrive for change and progress, and so relationships also inevitably undergo change. Because of this, relationships within Western cultures be usually discontinuous and only fleeting. In many Eastern cultures, they have a high regard for heritage and ancestry. Unlike in Western cultures, change is not so quickly accepted. Non-Western cultures emphasise the idea of continuity and so relationships are often permanent.An anaesthetise with this theory is that Western cultures have only recently been more accepting of temporary relationships. In the 1950s, womens roles changed dramatically, and they since have had more of a choice within relationships. Since contraception also was introduced, women have gained greater freedom to participate in relationships as this makes the burden of a child optional. This has made break ups and divorces a lot more ac ceptable in the Western world.This recent change may consider that the differences between Western and Non-Western societies may not be down to the culture itself but due to the social mobility and urbanisation of the family. This makes conclusions taken from this theory hard to generalise, as it may not even be a correct representation of Western and Non-Western culture. You cannot define a culture by its level of urbanisation. There are many distinct differences between relationships in different cultures, as highlighted by various psychological studies and theories.The main similarity in these is that they usually result in relationships being categorised by being Western or Non-Western. Although these categories are commonly used to describe cultural relationships within psychology, a major issue with this is that it makes the study or theory reductionist. This is because it suggests that all relationships can be broken down into two simple components. Reducing relationships i nto these two simple categories poses the danger of many factors of relationships being disregarded.Individual differences of those involved will massively shape their behaviour within the relationship. For example, some people who live in a Western society may still choose to undergo an arranged marriage (and vice versa), depending on their preferences. Because of this, it is hard to generalise conclusions from these studies/theories to a wider society as they dont necessarily represent the entire demographic. Drawing such conclusions can leave them susceptible to abuse and manipulation, which could be seen as forms of racism. This can be considered as unethical.